The Atlantic asked me five hard questions, to which I responded at some length. It’s nice not to have to compress!
Andrew Keen had me on TechCrunch TV, which was generous of him. Thanks, Andrew.
[A few minutes later] The always-fresh CBC radio program, Spark, just posted a 26 minute interview with me. (Nora Young is a wonderful. There, I said it.)

#1 by Seth Finkelstein on January 7, 2012 - 11:10 pm
Quote
Regarding this part about Carr’s _The Shallows_ – “In any case, Carr’s book is admirably, straightforwardly technodeterminist: mere interaction with the Internet rewires our brains and diminishes our capacity for important forms of thought.” – it’s not my fight, I’ve been very critical of that book, and Nick Carr does not need me to defend him. And yes, I know the politics, between you and him.
However, just for the futility of it – this is really quite a misreading of the Internet technodeterminist opposition, where I count myself. It’s conflated physical and political effects. For example (note positions deliberately exaggerated for effect):
1) Automobile evangelist – “Automobiles subvert hierarchy, our world is being democratically disrupted at the touch of an engine. The mobility and personal linkage these new autos create will usher in a new era of freedom, against that old authoritarian legacy horse-bound society.”
2) Automobile anti-determinist – “Governments and police can use automobiles too. The army can even buy heavy vehicles for suppressing rebellions”.
3) _The Cripples_ author – “Using automobiles turns everyone into cripples, since they no longer walk as much as they once did. Kids today, those spoiled brats who are “driven” everywhere, may eventually be unable to walk entirely”.
The argument of #3 (whether true or false) is not the sort of “determinism” at issue between #1 and #2.